1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1 of the parties concerned is the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”).

(2) Defendant A is the driver of the B CV (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant CV”).

Defendant KB Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant KB Insurance”) is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to Defendant CV.

B. (1) The occurrence of the instant accident occurred on February 5, 2014, Defendant A at the request of D president E in the D camping site located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, A around 15:40 on February 5, 2014, equipment, the weight of which is one ton of Defendant C, (Red Ppepe Sbtilr, hereinafter “instant equipment”).

2) The cargo vehicle was loaded on board the vehicle. At the time of the accident, the equipment of this case, which is boomed on the boom boom 2) Defendant Cicker’s boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom booms at the end of the accident, and the boom boom booms to load on the boom boom booms.

E and F (hereinafter referred to as “disaster”) put the instant equipment into the two sides with a string of “Igly fluor on the two sides” (the same type as the aid that the following strings), and the Defendant A placed the string of the instant equipment in the two tensions of the equipment, and the string of the strings of the Defendant Crest, who would get off the Defendant Crest, was placed in the string of Crest.

3) A cargo vehicle article is going up on the cargo vehicle, and E, disaster victims, and G were in the vicinity of the cargo vehicle (see the foregoing drawings). Defendant A was loaded with the cargo vehicle using the instant equipment as Defendant Crick in accordance with the reception of E. In order for E and disaster victims to fix the instant equipment in the middle of the loading box. While the instant equipment was pushed down on the right hole of the instant equipment, the accident was caused by the Defendant’s head while the instant equipment was cut down. The disaster victim did not wear the safety mother at the time, and died due to severe brain damage (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(b)..