beta
Text
1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.
Purport of claim and appeal
1.
Reasons
1. The facts following the facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3 through 11, 14, 19 through 22, 26, Gap evidence No. 2-1 through 3, Gap evidence No. 12-1 through 17, Gap evidence No. 13-1, 15-2, Gap evidence No. 25-4, 5, Eul evidence No. 1, 5, 5, and Eul evidence No. 7-3.
The parties to the defendant's clan is a clan similar organization that sets up multiple common lines, namely, Emph 25 years old, and G.
Defendant C is a general secretary of Defendant clan from around 2000 to 2005, and a real estate agent operating “H real estate” from November 2005 to February 201.
B. Change of ownership and current status of I forest land in the Gu, Si, Gu, Si, Gu and Si Do 1) Since each land is located in the same Dong, each land is located in the same Dong, the lot number is specified only.
(2) On April 6, 200, the Defendant clan owned a 4,873 square meters of I forest land and J forest land and 681 square meters of land on April 6, 200. (2) On April 6, 2000, the Gyeongbuk-do acquired the 4,873 square meters of I forest land from the Defendant clan to build a Do highway, and as a subsequent plan was modified, the 1,701 square meters of forest land was incorporated into a road site and the remaining 3,172 square meters of forest land were not incorporated.
3) On January 9, 2003, Defendant C and D knew that part of the above woodland may be repurchased because it was not used for the purpose of expropriation, and on January 9, 2003, prepared a sales contract and a written statement of performance stating that “In the event that the Defendant clan redeems the 4,873 square meters of I forest land from the Youngbuk-do, D deals with the business of repurchase for the Defendant clan, bears the expenses, and instead, the Defendant clan will sell the above woodland to D plus the sum of KRW 100,000,000 for the repurchase cost (hereinafter “instant agreement”).”
In the process, D promised to sell the above forest land to another person and offer 1/3 of the profits to Defendant C in the event that the profit remains.
Defendant C is around June 2003.