1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for this decision regarding this part of the facts admitted are as follows: (a) by adding the following parts to the 4th 5th eth eth son of the judgment of the first instance; and (b) by adding “A No. 16 and B No. 14” to the 5th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth s

“B” A business that constructs and sells apartment units on the ground outside G in the Guri-si and 39 lots between the NAS Technology Co., Ltd. on January 15, 2007 (hereinafter “instant G business”).

B) concluded an agreement to promote B. On January 25, 2007, H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) which is a specially related company

A) Around January 21, 2010, 201 transferred all enforcement authority related to the instant G business with respect to the said G business, and as a result, H either received 30% of the business revenue (pre-payment revenue) from H, or entered into a contract for transfer or acquisition of business rights to receive 3.5 billion won until December 30, 201. Around January 21, 2010, NAE technology filed a lawsuit claiming payment of the settlement amount related to the instant G business against H (Korean District Court 2010Da5733). During the said lawsuit, NAE technology and H entered into a settlement agreement, and some of the contents were organized as a fact that there was no dispute in the pleading protocol on April 5, 2012.

On August 16, 2012, the above court rendered a judgment dismissing the claim of NAS Technology on the ground that “H has no money to be paid to NAE technology as a result of the calculation under the above settlement agreement, and rather, NAE technology should pay the settlement amount to H,” and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

B around August 20, 2013, around 2013, H claimed 3.5 billion won under the business license transfer contract as of January 25, 2007, and H claimed 3.5 billion won and damages for delay. Accordingly, H made payment on August 22, 2013, instead of paying the above amount.