1. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. A. On September 22, 2012, around 23:48, B: (a) a vehicle B (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) was parked in the signal atmosphere near the front end of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu Automatic Motor Vehicle; (b) the said vehicle was pushed the Plaintiff’s D vehicle, which was waiting in front of the vehicle, while pushing the vehicle into shock.

(hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. The defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the defendant vehicle.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, evidence No. 1 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant should compensate for damages, such as lost income, medical expenses, consolation money, etc. related to the above injury, since the plaintiff suffered from the injury of the Republic of Korea, which is the right sliver of the right sliver of the accident in this case.

In regard to this, the defendant asserts that the king, the first half of which the plaintiff received treatment, was due to the plaintiff's king, and that there was no causal relationship with the accident of this case.

3. The accident of this case, the existence of the Plaintiff’s genetic disability and the existence of the Plaintiff’s genetic disability ought to be proven by the Plaintiff actively.

In full view of the results of the physical examination commission of the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 of Eul, and of the fact finding, the physical examination of the Plaintiff was a minor accident that led to the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the part behind the Plaintiff’s vehicle, to the extent that it does not cause any strings, and the physical examination of the Plaintiff’s status does not seem to have any strings due to the Plaintiff’s appearance of the strings, the strings, the strings, and the increase in the strings or the strings, and the possibility that the strings’ degree of contribution to the instant accident may not be ruled out, while the strings’ degree of contribution to the instant accident is assessed to the extent of 50%, and the Plaintiff’s treatment of the strings from around 2009.