1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 22, 2014, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on a short-term visit (C-3) visa on August 22, 2014, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on September 2, 2014.

B. On March 10, 2015, the Defendant issued a disposition to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff cannot be deemed as having “a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would suffer from persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. As to this, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on March 19, 2015, but was dismissed on September 24, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that he/she was married to the Sim-Pacific female at around 2010, and that on April 4, 2014, B, a second lusian B, sought the Plaintiff with an armed person, and made intimidation that he/she would die with the Plaintiff if he/she did not go to the Simpha while searching the Plaintiff.

Accordingly, both the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s family members feel a threat of life, the Plaintiff’s parents are Ebb (IB), and the Plaintiff’s denial was sent to Tiz (Tiz), and the Plaintiff left Korea as Republic of Korea, which is hidden in Eiz-friendly home.

In the event that the Plaintiff returned to mentmen, the instant disposition, which did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee, was unlawful, despite the possibility of being affected by gambling for the said reasons.

B. (1) In full view of the provisions of Article 2 Subparag. 1 and Article 18 of the Refugee Act, Article 1 of the Refugee Convention, and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol, a State of nationality may be protected due to well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion.