A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On August 8, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to three months of imprisonment with prison labor for occupational embezzlement in the credit support of Suwon Franchisium, and was pending in trial by appeal and appeal. On January 15, 2015, the Daegu District Court sentenced the Defendant to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, and on March 12, 2015, completed the execution of the sentence in the Daegu Detention House and nine times of criminal fraud.

[Criminal facts]

1. Fraud;

A. On January 2017, the Defendant borrowed 13 million won out of 50 million won as down payment to the Defendant Company C to purchase the telecom with a view to the Hongcheon Building, which is equivalent to KRW 600,000,000,000 for business.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant only consumed the money received from the injured party for the cost of living, and did not have the intent or ability to repay the money to the injured party.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received delivery of KRW 13 million around January 13, 2017 from the injured party.

B. On March 27, 2017, the Defendant would receive a loan from the victim C under the name of "A vehicle for business" and complete payment within 20 days of purchase of benz.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, even if the defendant was given a loan under the name of the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim take out a loan equivalent to KRW 29 million on the same day, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

(c)

The Defendant, around June 2017, intended to purchase real estate in 700 million won to the Victim C, “I wish to purchase the real estate in Da, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and I wish to complete payment up to July 20, 2017, if I borrowed an intermediate payment of KRW 20 million.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant only used the money received from the injured party for the cost of living, and did not have the intention or ability to pay it.

The defendant deceivings the victim and is under his control.