1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part on the final correction (reduction) in the attached Table 2 stating the Defendant’s content of the disposition.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance for the acceptance of the judgment is as follows. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the judgment of the plaintiffs as to the allegations in the appellate court is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition of the judgment of the appellate court as set forth in the following 2. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with

In addition, "the corporate tax was reported" in Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is the third part of the judgment, shall be considered as "the corporate tax was reported".

“(Transfer Income Tax)” shall be added to “49,009,090” in the second column 3 of the fifth Table of the judgment of the first instance.

It shall be deleted from the 7th judgment of the first instance (hereinafter referred to as "the same as "the first disposition") to the 4th judgment.

The following shall be added to the fourth part of the 7th judgment of the first instance.

Other. The plaintiffs asserted that the appraisal of the value of the shares of this case, which are non-listed shares, was erroneous in the appraisal of the purchase house of Chungcheong P and Chuncheon P, which H held by the plaintiffs. The defendants accepted the above claims by the plaintiffs, and made a correction for reduction, such as the "disposition for Reduction of Correction" in the attached Table 2, which is the 43,196 won from 42,696 won per share to 44,375 won per share, as of March 17, 2008, and the appraised value of the shares of this case as of April 30, 2009, 44,025 won per share, and 42,696 won per share.

E. Meanwhile, on March 2, 2011, the head of Chuncheon Tax Office imposed corporate tax on H for the business year 2005 or 2009, and H filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of the said imposition of corporate tax, and the head of Chuncheon Tax Office rendered a favorable judgment on the grounds of illegality, such as: (a) the head of Chuncheon Tax Office, upon filing a lawsuit seeking revocation of the said imposition of corporate tax; and (b) the head of Chuncheon Tax Office rendered a favorable judgment on the grounds that the said disposition was rendered by deeming the pertinent assets as business-related assets as business-related assets; and (c) accordingly, the said head of