1. The Defendant’s KRW 95,084,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from May 11, 2017 to June 30, 2017.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1-1 through 2, the plaintiff can be found to have prepared and sold five million won in total, including 95,084,00 won, including dyspath and dys, on five occasions from April 21, 2017 to April 26, 2017, to the agricultural company B, which was introduced by the defendant, which was introduced by the defendant. The defendant on May 10, 2017, to the plaintiff on May 10, 2017, the amount of 50 million won out of the above price of the goods, and the remainder on May 22, 2017, with an annual statement of performance (hereinafter "written statement of performance of this case"). Barring any special circumstance, the defendant is obligated to pay 95,084,000 won to the plaintiff according to the agreement as to each of the above goods and damages for delay from May 17, 2017.

2. The defendant's argument regarding the defendant is merely an introduction of connecting the plaintiff and the vice president of the plaintiff and the agricultural company B's C vice president so that smooth transactions can be achieved. The plaintiff's strong pressure and forcedly prepared the above performance letter, and denied its validity. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the defendant prepared the above performance letter by the plaintiff's strong pressure. Thus, the above argument is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.