1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs (appointed parties) and the designated parties are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the appeal is dismissed or added as stated in the following (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be removed or added;

A. The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “surging” in the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be regarded as “surging”.

The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance is "Thump defect" in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance as "Alump defect".

The third part of the first instance judgment "161mol/L" in the 16th part of the 16th sentence is "161mEq/L."

The unit "mol/L" as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment is all "mEq/L".

The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance states that the luosis has been achieved by lusis" in the 8th part of the judgment of the court of first instance as “clusis has been observed by lusis.”

In Part 9 of Part 8 of the judgment of the first instance, "Sololk" is considered as "Sololk", and "high Tink" as "high Tink", respectively.

The 8th 16th 16th son of the judgment of the court of first instance is different from the 16th son.

B. The supplementary part of the judgment of the court of first instance is with merit

2.(a)

(7) The following parts shall be added to the 7th page (No. 13):

Although there was an opinion that it is not urgently required to treat because it was smaller than 5.5mm from the outside of the medical pressure diagnosis of the fruit H’s her clothes, and the result of the cooperation, the treatment standard was less than 5.5m, the Defendant’s medical personnel rapidly demoted the blood pressure below the appropriate numerical value, such as administering the fladine, thereby causing damage to the telegraph, such as low-resistant high blood pressure, acute salutism, hys, and waste, such as hystrophism, and hystrophism, resulting in the death of H. Of the reasoning of the first instance judgment.

3.The following parts shall be added to:

G-1. The plaintiffs' blood pressure on the plaintiffs' assertion 8.