A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 29, 2015, at around 17:47, the Defendant, at the front of 11:57,103, the two Northwest-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 2015, reported that the disabled friendship was assaulted, and reported that C et al., who was dispatched to the site, continued to identify the circumstances of the case against the reporter, etc., and recommended C to return home only during the vision, the Defendant expressed C’s desire to “Chewing few, few, few, few, son, etc.,” and interfered with C’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases at one time by a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order to Attend the Course of Education [Scope of Recommendation] and the basic area of the obstruction of the performance of official duties (six to one year and four months) [decision of the sentence] is not easy, but it does not have any record of being sentenced more severe than the fine, and it reflects the fact that there is no record of being sentenced more severe than the fine.