logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.07.19 2017나576
물품대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

2...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant and the co-defendant D of the court below are co-defendants with the sentence.

B. On May 24, 2014, the Plaintiff supplied to D 20 boxes 600 for men’s 20 and 600 boxes for women’s 20 boxes 1,200 boxes 1,200 for each page (hereinafter “the instant goods”) and 20,640,000 won for total goods.

C. At the time, D signed on the certificate of shipment (D presented its driver’s license to the Plaintiff), and agreed to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 20,640,000 for the said goods in three installments on a 15-day basis from the date of delivery (on June 9, 2014, June 24, 2014, and July 9, 2014).

Then, the Defendant returned 540 copies of the instant goods to the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry and video of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant purchased the goods of this case jointly with D and agreed to pay the price for the goods to the plaintiff jointly with D. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay 11,220,000 won for the remaining 660 copies of the goods except for the return of goods of this case to the plaintiff.

B. The following facts and circumstances, which are either no dispute between the parties to the judgment or can be found according to the aforementioned evidence, namely, ① the Defendant and D are engaged in the two clothes retail business, ② at the time when D was supplied the instant goods in the Plaintiff’s warehouse, the Defendant was also D, and ③ the said return was made by the Defendant (the Defendant was directly brought to the Plaintiff’s warehouse, and D did not go to the Plaintiff). At the time, the Defendant presented his driver’s license to the Plaintiff, and the Defendant issued his driver’s license to the Plaintiff as stated “E and Presid C,” and the number of the returned goods “18 BOx and the shipment quantity 22Ox 60” and delivered to the Plaintiff, if the parties were to have written their signature and delivered it to the Plaintiff.

arrow