(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.10.27 2017고단1182

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.10.27 2017고단1182

교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, the Defendants are above two years from the date of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is engaged in driving of CEX car, and Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving of DF car, and Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving of DF car.

Defendant

A, at around 08:30 on April 1, 2017, if there is a 08:30 on the river, if you go to turn to the left from the village of the village of the village of the village of the village of the village of the So-ri-ri So-ri So-ri, and Defendant B came to go to the spores of the spores from the both sides of the spores.

There is no signal, and there is a place where it is difficult to secure the view through a tri-distance intersection that is not supported by traffic control, so there was a duty of care to temporarily stop prior to entering the intersection, and even after entering the intersection, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by putting the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, Defendant A did not look at the left and right while entering the intersection and did not temporarily stop the intersection, Defendant B did not go against the upper part of the left-hand door of EXE car due to the negligence that Defendant B did not temporarily stop the intersection.

Ultimately, the Defendants caused a victim E (the age of 80) who was on the back of the CEX car due to the above occupational negligence, to have the victim E (the age of 80), who was on the back of the CEX car, died with a stroke in around 12:33 on the same day, and caused the victim F (the age of 84), who was on the back seat of the same vehicle, to have the victim F (the age of 84) who was on the back seat of the same vehicle located at the H hospital located in G at the time of leisure water around 12:39 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to I and J;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. A medical certificate of each death, each postmortem report, and each postmortem photo;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the scene of traffic accident;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Articles 268 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts

1. Commercial concurrence (the Defendants).

참조조문

-교통사고처리 특례법 제3조 제1항

-형법 제30조

-형법 제268조

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 2015.10.15 2015고단814

-인천지방법원 2017.01.18 2015고단7717

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2013.04.25 2013고단276

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2019.08.13 2019고단232

-청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.05.12 2016고정19