A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 28, 2014, at around 23:10 on March 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol at a two-lane crossing the B-lane in front of the 81string-ro B-ro B-ro apartment of the Gyeonggi-gu Government Police Station, where the vehicle was in motion to prevent the vehicle from driving, and obstructed the traffic while taking a bath to the driver; (b) the Defendant was the victim C, a slope belonging to the 112 patrol police box of the Gyeonggi-gu Government Police Station where the vehicle was in motion; and (c) the victim D, the head of the same police station, to which the Defendant belongs, proposed the Defendant for traffic safety and the safety of the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant expressed that “I would have to take place the victim’s face once in drinking.”

As above, the defendant escaped about 50 meters after the victim C's face, and the victim resisted the victim to arrest the defendant as a flagrant offender, and resisted the victim D to the bottom, and 2-3 times the victim D's face was drinking.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim C, such as franchising, which does not need to be treated for about three weeks, on the part of the victim D, on the part of the victim D for about two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time interfered with police officers' legitimate execution of duties concerning crime prevention, protective measures, and arrest of flagrant offenders.

2. On March 28, 2014, at around 23:50 on March 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) arrested as a flagrant offender for the same reason as described in paragraph (1) at the police box located in Do Government-si, and entered the B police box; (b) taken photographs of the upper part of the police box belonging to the Fdistrict group of the Do Government Police Station, G taken a warning that “this franch, franch, franch, franch,” and spited the franch G’s face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1..