logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.08.24 2016노162
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the lower court rendered (2.5 million won in penalty, 40 hours in total, e.g., e., e., e., e., e., confiscation) is too un

2. The crime of this case is deemed to have taken the body parts of many unspecified women over several occasions, and there are unfavorable circumstances against the defendant, such as the frequency of the crime, and the degree of bodily injury or exposure of women shown in the image taken by the defendant, etc. However, although the defendant recognizes all the facts charged in this case and reflects it, the defendant has no particular criminal history other than the previous conviction sentenced to a fine due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the defendant has agreed with the police, and other circumstances shown in the records and arguments such as the defendant's character, character, environment, etc., the prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow