A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around September 21, 2016, the Defendant insultingd the Defendant in front of D in Ulsan-gu C market located in Ulsan-gu C market on September 11, 2016: (a) A pet dog, who was in his/her possession, was E and C, and thereby, reported 112.

The Defendant received the above 112 report and received a notification disposition as a violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act by bringing a disturbance to the floor, such as setting the sealing logs used by his hand while intending to take a bath to the F District G, etc. belonging to the Ulsan-nam Police Station F District G, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in the form of a person in an infinite name, etc., insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim, “I am, I am, I am, I am continuously issued, I am gue, I am gue, I am gue, I am, I am to am to execute public power, and I am to am.”

2. In front of the management office of the Cmarket Merchants’ Association, the Defendant obstructed legitimate performance of duties concerning handling 112 reports by assaulting a police officer who carried out the said 112 reporting duties, and took a bath that it is difficult for him to enter the F District, on his hand, to keep the H’s chest and trees fast and shoulder, and thereby obstructing the performance of duties concerning handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. A complaint;

1. Criminal report and investigation report;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (to the extent that the maximum term of two crimes is aggregated);

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6-1-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-6 months to 1-4 months). [Determination of sentence] Details and reasons for the crime of this case, and the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime.