Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. Facts charged;

A. Defendant A (2015 Gohap 333) 1) falsely entered and submitted a list of total invoices by customer, and the Defendant was a person who held office as a representative director of the State (hereinafter “G”) from around 2004 to August 2014.

On July 25, 2011, the Defendant filed a final return on the value-added tax for G with respect to January 201 at the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yeongdeungpo-gu District Tax Office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul. In fact, G operated by the Defendant did not supply goods or services to H (hereinafter “H”) and provided sales invoices equivalent to the total supply value of KRW 71,892,726, as if it were supplied.

A list of total tax invoices by customer was submitted to the above tax office with false entries.

In addition, the Defendant, from April 25, 2009 to the above day from April 25, 2009, provided a total of KRW 12,852,465,642 on a total of 10 occasions as stated in the list of crimes (1), as if he supplied a total of KRW 12,852,465,642, as stated in the list of crimes, and submitted it to the competent tax office.

순번 범행 일 귀속 거래처 공급 가액( 원) 비고 1 2009. 4. 25. 2009년 1기 H 1,772,864,547 2 2009. 7. 25. “ “ 906,045,827 3 2009. 10. 25. 2009년 2기 “ 1,326,636,363 4 2010. 1. 25. “ “ 2,063,936,362 5 2010. 4. 25. 2010년 1기 “ 1,663,036,366 6 2010. 7. 25. “ “ 1,546,753,819 7 2010. 10. 25. 2010년 2기 “ 1,364,818,179 8 2011. 1. 25. “ “ 1,003,597,999 9 2011. 4. 25. 2011년 1기 “ 1,204,776,180 10 2011. 7. 25. “ “ 711,892,726 합 계 12,852,465,642 범 죄 일 람 표 (1) 2) 매입처 별세 금 계산서 합계표 허위 기재 및 제출 피고인은 2011. 7. 25. 경 위 영등포 세무서에서 G에 대한 2011년도 1 기분 부가 가치세 확정신고를 하면서, 사실은 피고인이 운영하는 G은 ( 주) 케이티 네트 웍스( 변경 후 상호 ( 주) 케이티 이 엔에스, 이하 ‘ 케이티 이 엔에스 ’라고 한다 )로부터 재화 또는 용역을 공급 받은 사실이 없음에도 이를...