1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. On January 20, 2007, the Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant is obligated to take over the procedure for ownership transfer registration as to the instant automobile, since the Plaintiff, on January 20, 200, to sell a vehicle listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) owned by the Plaintiff, to KRW 15 million, paid the said money in full to the Defendant, and at the same time, issued all documents necessary for the registration of ownership transfer.

In regard to this, the defendant asserted that upon the plaintiff's request from the plaintiff who was known through the introduction, the plaintiff introduced the plaintiff on the sales of the automobile of this case, which he was known to the plaintiff and did not receive the documents necessary for the sale price or the transfer registration of ownership of this case from the plaintiff.

2. On January 20, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendant on January 20, 2007 only with respect to the instant motor vehicle evidence Nos. 1 and 2.

It is insufficient to acknowledge that the Defendant received all documents necessary for the registration of purchase price and transfer of ownership from the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair in conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the defendant's appeal.