logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.06.30 2015고정398
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 02:05 on January 26, 2015, the Defendant driven a B low-water vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.089% from the 3.7km section to the parking lot for the local food store in the Taejin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City from the front day of the Daegu Pung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Songcheon-gu, Songcheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City to the front day of the Jinjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those who are engaged in driving a B high-speed car.

On January 26, 2015, at around 02:05, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol as above, and led to a flown distance of 161, the Hanjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Songcheon-ro, Seoul, to proceed at about 20 km each other at a speed of about 3 lanes from the scirical basin to the scirical vibration.

At the time, there was a passenger car in the front direction, and thus, the driver had a duty of care to prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the front line and the left and right of the driver and accurately manipulating the steering system.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant did not find out the fact that the DSS5 car operated by the victim C(38 years of age) is in a traffic signal atmosphere at the front section of the said SM5 car due to negligence, which was negligent, and did not change the part behind the said SM5 car into the front part of the said CM5 car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim C and the victim E (the 24-year old age), who was on the said SM5 car by occupational negligence, each of the two-day medical treatment of approximately two weeks, and attempted to flee without immediately stopping the said SM5 car, even though it damages approximately KRW 4,102,50 to ensure that the said SM5 car can be repaired for repair costs, and instead does not take measures such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Reports and photographs on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

arrow