Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a business owner of "D" located in Seo-gu Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, which is a village of sexual traffic.

No person shall arrange, solicit, induce or compel sexual traffic.

Nevertheless, at around 23:05 on March 11, 2020, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts for unspecified customers by providing the police officer with the crackdown on customers who pretended to be customers in front of the above "D," "at least KRW 80,00 won, and show 30,000,000,000 won," together with sexual sex women, and by providing the sexual intercourse with the sexual traffic women.

In addition, on May 10, 2020, the defendant "I will conduct business to the police officer who pretended to be customers at the above place."

In other words, sexual traffic E, who was in the waiting room in the business place, provided the above police officers with the second floor of the business place and received 80,000 won for sexual traffic and arranged sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. The criminal statements made by the defendant in this court and each statement in the detection report (mediation of sexual traffic);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes written in the F and E;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including the relevant Article of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including the preparation of a punishment, and the choice of a punishment for an offense (excluding punishment)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The prosecutor's determination of the punishment for additional collection of 80,000 won from the defendant based on Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including the Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, etc. However, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone cannot be known that the defendant acquired profits from the crime of this case. Thus, the prosecutor's determination of the punishment for additional collection of 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not imposed.

The reason for sentencing is that the defendant confessions the crime and reflects the fact that the defendant's profit acquired by the crime of this case seems to be gross, etc. is considered as favorable to the defendant, and the defendant has been punished once for the same kind of crime.