1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) is a company engaged in real estate development and implementation business, and the total number of shares issued by the said company is 600,000 shares.

B. The defendant is a director and a representative director of the non-party company. The plaintiff is a shareholder who holds 240,000 shares of ordinary shares of the non-party company (40% of the total number of issued shares).

C. The Plaintiff and Nonparty D prepared the minutes of the extraordinary shareholders’ meeting on September 24, 2015 of the non-party company’s company, and a notary public obtained certification as a notary public No. 7456 on September 24, 2015. The main contents are as follows.

On September 24, 2015, at the office of the principal office of the company at the 10:00 am on September 24, 2015, an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders is held.

The plaintiff of in-house director 300,000 shares of 600,000 shares total number of 300,000 shares total number of shareholders and 600,000 shares total number of shareholders is the chairperson's seat.

The Speaker shall declare that this Assembly has been lawfully held and shall adopt a resolution to deliberate on the following bills:

1: The chairperson of the case for the replacement of officers shall explain that the company director and the representative director shall not perform their duties by making a provisional disposition of suspension of duties by the court due to the illegal act, and propose to supplement the officers.

All shareholders agree at the end of the debate at the time and appoint the following persons as intra-company directors at full time.

In other words, the recipient shall accept it at the seat.

In-house directors D Bill 2: The Chairperson of the case for the appointment of the representative director has proposed to appoint the representative director, and the in-house director is appointed as a full-time director.

The plaintiff shall immediately accept it.

The plaintiff's representative director's [founded ground for recognition] without dispute, each entry of Gap's 2 through 9 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiff's assertion is that the defendant, who is a director and representative director of the non-party company, was the non-party D before the project implementation site and removal.