Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B The agricultural cooperative is a corporation established for the purpose of the business of refining and selling grain produced by its members, etc., and the defendant A is a person who is the head of sales division in the F rice processing complex in the F rice processing complex in Yongsan-si, and is a person in charge of the business of Doing and selling grain.

1. From October 4, 2016 to November 1, 2016, Defendant A: (a) marked the date of the determination of the price of grain equivalent to KRW 19,901,095 on the total period of the foregoing period, including manufacturing and attaching a CD on the date of delivery, when he/she packages rice 43,655 km in a rice processing complex from the said rice processing complex into “G”, etc.; and (b) stored the Doed rice in a warehouse without marking the Doed rice date; and (c) when the order entered, Defendant A displayed the date of determination of the price of grain equivalent to KRW 19,901,095 on the total period of the foregoing period.

2. Defendant B’s agricultural cooperative, Defendant B, an employee of the agricultural cooperative, committed a violation against his duties by setting the date of grain processing differently from the facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The defendant B's legal statement of the representative of the agricultural cooperative H in part

1. Part of the witness A’s legal statement (limited to Defendant B’s agricultural cooperative);

1. A copy of a copy of the sales performance of agricultural cooperatives classified by item B and of the paper of the Do work;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing evidence photographs of the violator;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 32 subparag. 3 of the Grain Management Act and Article 20-3 subparag. 1 of the Act, and selection of fines

(b) Defendant B agricultural cooperative: Articles 35, 32 subparagraph 3, and 20-3 subparagraph 1 of the Grain Management Act;

1. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination as to the assertion of Defendant B’s agricultural cooperative and defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant B’s agricultural cooperative is the grain dealer or grain processor, who is the main point of the assertion.