beta
Text
1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 75,00,000 and the interest rate thereon from March 16, 2013 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The parties’ relevant Defendant C is the husband of Defendant C, the representative director of Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) and the auditor of Defendant B.
B. On September 4, 2006, the Plaintiff’s loan 1) The Plaintiff’s financial loan to the Defendants is the Defendant C’s agent, and the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Sofri-Mao-Mao-Mao-Mao-Mao-Ma (hereinafter “Nonindicted-Mao-Mao-Ma”)
(E) between E in Seopo-si E (hereinafter referred to as “E”).
(2) The lower court concluded a real estate lease agreement with the following terms: F forest 670 square meters, G forest 1422 square meters, H forest 1954 square meters, and I forest 1065 square meters and 11,201 square meters of land (3,391 square meters) with the leased object; and concluded a real estate lease agreement with the terms that designate the leased object as the leased object for 15 years (15 years). The lower court, on each of the above land, installed the lower court’s facility on the land, and planted the fruit of the Defendant’s fruit trees, such as Hanbong, Hancheon, and Hancheon-
(2) On January 19, 2012, the Plaintiff and J (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) entered into a monetary loan agreement with the Defendants to lend KRW 80 million to the said Defendants, deducted KRW 5 million under the name of prior interest, etc., and paid KRW 75 million to the Defendants.
(2) In the event that Defendant C and D are unable to pay KRW 120 million to the Plaintiff, etc. by February 29, 2012, the Plaintiff, etc. entered into an agreement on the transfer of the right to use real estate (hereinafter “instant transfer agreement”) with the Plaintiff, etc. on the following grounds: (a) Defendant C and D entered into a contract on the transfer of the right to use real estate (hereinafter “instant transfer agreement”); and (b) Defendant C and D notified Nonparty D of the said transfer to Nonparty C and D on the same day.
3) Defendant C and D did not repay KRW 120 million to the Plaintiff, etc. by February 29, 2012. (4) The Defendants, on March 1, 2013, to K, the representative director of the Plaintiff, were to return KRW 120 million with respect to the instant loan by March 15, 2013.