The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

The Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into an agreement on mutual performance (hereinafter “instant agreement”) between the Plaintiff and the Defendant to purchase 10,097 square meters of the Seoul Factory site in Namsung-gun, Namsung-gun and its ground obstacles in the purchase price of KRW 2 billion (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

Appellants and claims against the defendant the implementation as provided for in the above agreement.

According to the evidence No. 1 of this case (the instant agreement), D (hereinafter referred to as “A”) and E (hereinafter referred to as “B”) enter into the following mutual performance agreements so that ownership in the assets of the Fund in the attached Form B may be acquired.

The facts indicated in the judgment below (the Plaintiff’s name before its change) and the statement in the parties at the end of the contract are printed in the same letter as “A” and “B”, and the above “D” contains D’s resident registration number and individual address, and signed and sealed D’s personal seal. The above “E representative director of the Plaintiff E-M in the contract” is affixed with the Plaintiff’s seal affixed on the Plaintiff’s corporate seal affixed to the Plaintiff, and other facts, separately from “B,” which referred to as “B,” which are not owned by “B,” but the subject matter of this contract to be acquired by the Plaintiff, are not owned by “B,” and the Plaintiff’s claim against “B,” which is not the subject matter of this case’s agreement, is not the subject matter of this case’s agreement to acquire specific assets owned by “B,” and the Plaintiff’s claim against “B,” is not the subject matter of this case’s agreement, and thus, it is not clear that the Plaintiff and the parties to this case’s agreement were the subject matter of this case’s agreement.

The plaintiff, although he did not have to do so.