Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 27, 2005, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for habitual fraud at the District Court of the Speaker on June 27, 2005, and the same criminal records are three times more.

1. Habitual fraud;

A. On September 28, 2015, the Defendant acquired the same amount of monetary benefits as the Defendant did not pay KRW 2,800, not paying the taxi fee in the vicinity of the said purchase square, while the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the taxi fee in front of the head office of the new bank located in Chuncheon-si (Sacheon-si) in front of the head office of the new bank located in Chuncheon-si (Sacheon-si).

B. On the 29th 29th 13:00 of the same month as the preceding paragraph, the Defendant did not pay 4,600 won prior to the “G Child Care Center” located in the same city and did not pay 4,600 won to the victim D (63 Do, South) on board the E-si located in the same city, while having no intent or ability to pay the taxi fee in front of the Dongbu market in Chuncheon-si.

C. On the 29th 29th 02:00 of the same month as in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant was provided with the amount equivalent to 35,000 won at the market price, such as scam and scam, even though the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price at the “J” restaurant operated by the victim I (65 Doh, n) in Chuncheon-si.

D. On October 14, 2015, the Defendant acquired economic benefits equivalent to the same amount of money as he/she did not drink and pay the price by making a total of 27,000 won, including 24,000 won for tea stuffs, 24,000 won for liquor and food, and 3,000 won for liquor, without the Defendant’s ability and intent to pay the food value at “M” restaurant in which the victim L (5, 55, 500, South) was placed, L (M).

E. On November 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 11:40, around 11:40, the Defendant acquired the same amount of proprietary benefits because he did not pay for the food value at the “P” restaurant operated by the Defendant, without having the ability and intent to pay for the food value; (b) three in black salt farms; (c) three in Jeju; and (d) one in drinking water; and (e) 34,000 won in total; and (c) did not pay for the food value; and (d) obtained the same amount of pecuniary benefits.