The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, it is reasonable to view that Defendant B, an employee of Defendant C Co., Ltd., was aware of the fact that the store in this case is provided for sexual traffic.

Nevertheless, since the court below acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged in this case, it erred by misapprehending the facts and misapprehending the legal principles, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The court below found the Defendants not guilty on the grounds that the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting a crime. The judgment of the court below is just and acceptable. The court below did not err by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles as alleged by the prosecutor, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.