Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who supplies the articles of dissolution, and Defendant B is a person who operates the "Djuk" located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C, and is in a mutual transaction relationship.

1. On June 16, 2014, Defendant A, at around 01:20, injured the victim’s face by assaulting that the victim B (the age of 43) did not settle the price of goods at the “Dju shop”, Defendant A committed an injury in the number of treatment days, such as having the victim take the face of the victim by drinking, and having the victim take the face at the left shoulder.

2. Defendant B suffered an assault from a victim A (the age of 36) at the date, time, and place mentioned in paragraph (1), and the victim suffered an injury on the days of treatment, such as making the victim enter the left eye of the victim by drinking against it, making the victim enter a hole on the left eye, making the victim take a part in both arms, and making the victim take part in both arms, etc.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B [Defendant B]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol to A;

1. The Defendants: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 257(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the "justifiable circumstances") of the suspended sentence; and

1. The scope of the recommended sentence on the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended sentence] general injury shall be the basic area ( April to one year and six months) (special person) of the first category; and

2. Although the Defendants were sentenced to punishment for the same crime, the Defendants were sentenced to suspended sentence in consideration of the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, etc., but the Defendants were subject to punishment for the same crime. However, the Defendants were led to confession and reflect on the instant crime, and there was no record of being punished more than a suspended sentence, and there was no record of being sentenced to