1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

In light of the above legal principles, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the right to collateral security (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200 million won; 20 million won; 30 million won; 200 won, etc.

3) On December 29, 2015, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement between M and M with respect to the instant apartment (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with a deposit of KRW 240,000,000 (payment of KRW 24,000,000 upon contract payment of KRW 216,00,000,000) and the remainder payment of KRW 216,00,000,000 for the remainder payment of the lease term from February 27, 2016 to February 26, 2018, the Defendant stipulated the following special terms and conditions (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

(2) According to the instant lease agreement, on December 21, 2015, KRW 2,00,00, out of the down payment of the deposit, KRW 22,00,000, and KRW 216,000,000, respectively, have been paid, respectively, on December 29, 2015, pursuant to the instant lease agreement. [Matters of special agreement] * the lease contract under the status of the right to sell a unit * * the amount of money (Won 50,000,000) shall be paid by the lessor (Attachment of a redemption receipt) * The amount of urban gas connection 20,000,000 among the down payment of the down payment of the deposit, KRW 22,00,000,000,000 for the remainder payment of the deposit, and KRW 216,000,000,000 on February 27, 2016).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 5, 10, 11, Eul evidence 1 through 4, 7, 14, 216, 27 (including each number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the witness's testimony and the whole purport of the pleading

2. The parties' assertion

A. A. A summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Defendant: (a) around 2012, owned by the Plaintiff; (b) KRW 100,00,000 from the operating income of the instant workplace; and (c)