beta
Text
Defendant
A and B shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.
Defendant
A and B fail to pay the above fine, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A around April 17, 2013, around 22:20 on April 17, 2013, at the toilet for commercial buildings located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Defendant A faced with the victim B (35 years of age, south) and shoulder, and became a vision.
Therefore, the defendant, who has been in the face of the victim, was faced with the face of the victim on the floor by drinking the victim after leaving the floor.
As a result, the defendant teared the body of the victim's head so that the victim could not know the number of days of treatment.
2. Defendant B and the victim A (year 34 years of age, south) at the above date and time, and at the above place, went to a trial with the victim for the foregoing reasons, and went to the victim’s face by drinking.
As a result, the defendant suffered an injury that could not be known to the victim because the victim's body, such as the victim's abath, was flicked.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and B;
1. Each police interrogation protocol of the defendant A and B;
1. E statements;
1. Application of A's standing photographs, B's standing photographs, and B's standing photographs;
1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment (Defendant A and B) concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;
2. The part (Defendant A and B) that dismisses the public prosecution under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (Defendant C).
1. The summary of the charges against Defendant C, around April 17, 2013, on the street of the commercial building located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Do Do 22:30 on April 17, 2013, Defendant C assaulted the victim by taking back back the back head and neck of the victim E (the victim 34 years of age and south) on the ground that he was wraped by Defendant C.
2. In light of the judgment, the above crime of assault is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement bound in the trial records, the fact that the victim E withdraws his/her wish to punish Defendant C on May 8, 2013, which was the date the prosecution of this case was instituted, is obvious.