The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentence (ten months of imprisonment and two years of probation, protection observation, community service order 80 hours, compliance driving lecture 40 hours) against the Defendant on the summary of the prosecutor’s appeal grounds is unreasonable as it is too unfasible.

2. There is no change in the terms and conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the lower court’s judgment because new materials on sentencing have not been submitted in the trial, and considering the factors revealed in the arguments in the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing was too unfluent and so, exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

It does not appear.

The prosecutor's improper argument in sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is without merit. Thus, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition. However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the "victim F" of the judgment below is corrected to "victim H."