본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.14 2016나17605

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).


1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

It is insufficient to reverse the conclusion of the judgment of the first instance court only with the descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 12 through 16 submitted by the plaintiff (Appointed Party) at the trial.

2. As such, all of the plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are dismissed without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the appeal by the plaintiff (appointed party) is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.