beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 64,195,101 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from January 5, 2016 to December 13, 2016.
Reasons
The Plaintiff is the owner of a plastic greenhouse installed in Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, and Defendant B is a taxi engineer who operates a private taxi (hereinafter “Defendant”), and Defendant A’s Federation of Private Passenger taxi Transport Business (hereinafter “Defendant Federation”) is an insurance company that Defendant B joined.
Since 2013, the Plaintiff has set up a beer with earth and sand in a certain height above the ground so that the Plaintiff has cultivated earth and sand in a quantitative cultivation manner in which water, nutrition, agrochemical, etc. are supplied through the following brearoto.
The quantitative cultivation method should be constantly supplied with the amount of nutritional content through the amount of cultivation pipe, and it is difficult to make the normal growth of Saturdays even if the amount of quantity is not supplied for several hours.
Around March 17, 2015, Defendant B, while driving the Defendant vehicle, was straighten in the vicinity of a vinyl on the road near a vinyl, conflicts with FF vehicles of Nonparty E driving, who was left left the left at the right edge, and due to this, Defendant B, who left the road, has a vinyl house collisioned the Plaintiff by leaving the road.
(hereinafter “instant accident.” As a result, the Plaintiff’s vinyl was partially destroyed, and part of the pipeline was destroyed by the distribution pipe supplied to the entire Saturdays in a vinyl house, and the earth and sand did not normally grow, and all of the tests were conducted around May 19, 2015.
[Ground of recognition] In light of the above facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 7, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including all of them) and the purport of the whole pleadings, the above facts of recognition are as follows. The plaintiff suffered damages equivalent to the decrease in operating profits due to the reduction in soil and sand production after the accident of this case. Thus, the defendants are jointly liable to compensate the plaintiff.