1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as follows, or the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment, except for adding the judgment equivalent to that of paragraph (2) to the allegations added by the plaintiff in this court. Thus, this shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420

The defendant in Chapter 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance is moving "the defendant to "the plaintiff".

No. 10 of the judgment of the first instance court, the following " without notice" is considered as "using the plaintiff's infinite experience, old-age, and rash conditions without notice or explanation."

No. 8 and 10 of the first instance court’s decision, “No. 4, at the time of the preparation of the No. 8 and 10 of the letter of consent to the use of the instant land,” the phrase “No. 31 and 32 (including the serial number) submitted by the Plaintiff is insufficient to recognize that at the time of the preparation of the letter of consent to the use of the instant land by the No. 31 and 32 (including the serial number), the Plaintiff had been in the state of poverty, rashness, or experience, or

2. Additional determination

A. After preparing the written consent to the land use of this case due to the change of the Plaintiff’s change of the circumstances, the Plaintiff and AG access roads, the Gun adjacent to the G-owned land, were expanded and packed, and the Defendant side expanded the scope of development activities more than twice and generated development gains more than twice, thereby rapidly changing the utility value of the land of this case.

Nevertheless, the defendant's side obtained the consent to the land use of this case without paying any price to the plaintiff.

Therefore, the Plaintiff’s agreement to consent to land use in 2013 and the agreement to consent to land use in 2016 was terminated by delivery of a copy of the instant complaint.

B. The circumstances that form the basis of the conclusion of the judgment contract have been significantly modified, the parties could not have foreseen it at the time of the formation of the contract, and thereby the contract is as it is.