logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.05.11 2017고합72
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인위계등추행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in self-support work of grade V, and the victim C (the victim C) is an intelligence index 66, a person suspected of light intellectual disability who has undergone psychological evaluation of age 13, and these are the relationship that he/she belongs to Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D and he/she becomes aware of while taking charge of cleaning at E elementary schools located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from May 2015 to August 2015.

The defendant does not have any fighting with the victim who performed his work under the same Article until he was disabled by the victim.

(2) The term "the Corporation" in this section.

“I wish to speak,” and “I wish to have the victim work on the ground that the victim does not properly clean,” and “I wish to have the victim work.”

It was known that there was a mental disorder with a lot of intelligence falling off compared to the general public while taking a large quantity of mental problems by putting the victim in mind by putting them into mind, but it was aware that there was a mental disorder with a lot of intelligence falling off compared to the general public.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Acts, such as deceptions against disabled persons);

A. On June 18, 2015, at around 15:00 on June 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Gangseo-gu counseling room for the fourth floor of E elementary school (sying room), and opened a string door so that the entrance does not see it, the Defendant: (a) had the victim syke and syke and syke with the victim; (b) had the victim syke and syke the victim syke; (c) but (d) had the victim syke and syke the victim syke; (b) had the victim syke the victim syke, who did not want to do so; and (c) had the victim syke and syke the victim syke, syke the victim syke and syke the victim syke.

This is the defendant.

arrow