1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 18, 2015, the Plaintiff worked as the head of the Defendant’s policy research room trend and statistics team for the Plaintiff’s external activities and the Defendant’s business trip attended the “C” workshop (hereinafter “instant external activities”) conducted by the Korea Health and Social Research Institute located in Sejong Special Self-Governing City. On the same day, the Plaintiff retired after attending the meeting for “D” at the Ministry of Education in the same city.

In addition, from March 19, 2015, the Plaintiff participated in the “E” meeting at the Korea Infant Care Agency from 9:00 to 15:00, and was retired from the F Child Care Center after attending the “Observation of infants using part-time infant care and interview with their parents” at the F Child Care Center from 15:0 to 19:00 (hereinafter “instant business trip”).

B. The Plaintiff was subject to prior resolution on each of the above business trips visiting the Ministry of Education and the Korea Infant Care Agency (referring to the Defendant’s president who is the representative before the change; hereinafter the same shall apply).

Meanwhile, on March 17, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for approval of the head of the policy research office and the head of the headquarters, who are immediately superior, to the approval of the instant external activities on March 17, 2015, and approval of the instant external activities on March 17, 2015, respectively. The head of the policy research office approved the instant external activities on March 18, 2015, and on March 18, 2015, the instant external activities on March 10, 2015, respectively, but did not receive prior approval from the head of the office of policy research.

C. On March 18, 2015, the warden sent a text message to the Plaintiff, stating that “The text message is written and linerd.” The Plaintiff sent a text message to the Plaintiff on March 18, 2015, and on March 19, 2015, who did not have the Plaintiff’s answer, sent the Plaintiff a text message stating that “The Plaintiff will contact the Plaintiff as a research institute. On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s internal business trip (referring to this case’s business trip) will be withheld from approval.”

The plaintiff submitted an explanatory note on March 23, 2015 upon the request of the warden, and the defendant submitted the explanatory note on March 30, 2015, and on March 30, 2015, "the third personnel committee or lower" is the case.