A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) took a bath while under the influence of alcohol in Soyang-gu B; (b) was arrested in the act of interference with duties, such as avoiding disturbance; and (c) was arrested in the act of assault; (d) around 21:35 on the same day, the Defendant expressed his desire to “the head of the police station belonging to the above area where the Defendant was investigating the circumstances of the instant case against the Defendant in the said area, and “the head of the gue fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order and the prevention of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1448, Jan. 1, 201; Supreme Court Decision 201Da1448, Feb. 1, 201; Supreme Court Decision 2