logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.01.15 2019나1154
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff, the seller of the Plaintiff’s alleged livestock products, supplied the Defendant with the instant product amounting to KRW 24,857,159, which is one of the instant livestock products from January 2, 2016 to July 2017, who operates the refined meat point in Dongducheon-si with the trade name “Dized meat store” in Dongducheon-si C, but did not receive the price for

Therefore, the defendant should pay to the plaintiff KRW 24,857,159 and delay damages.

2. According to the evidence evidence No. 3, although the above Dental E’s business registration was recognized as having been under the name of the defendant on December 10, 2013, according to the overall purport of the statements and arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the defendant’s husband E (Death on December 26, 2017) has registered the above Dental E’s business under the name of the defendant and operated the above Dental E’s business. The plaintiff supplied livestock products to the deceased E upon order from January 2016 to July 2017, the plaintiff agreed with the deceased E, the time and method for paying the price of the goods, and there was no further need for the court to examine the above facts that the defendant’s husband’s husband’s husband’s Ma was diagnosed with the Masung, and there was no other evidence that the defendant did not report the above E-Ma’s 31,2081 on the ground that the above E-Ma’s 281,2017.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow