logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.09.21 2016가합111759
손해배상청구 등의 소
Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 77,101,80 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from January 7, 2017 to September 21, 2017, and the following.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff’s right to move in refers to the right to move in (i.e., the right to move in to the owner of a house before entering into a housing sale contract, and (ii) the right to move in (i.e. the right to move in, the right to move in) the ownership of the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E land and buildings are determined to be subject to relocation measures as they are incorporated into a redevelopment project promoted by the Seoul Metropolitan Government Urban Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “SH Corporation”); and (iii) the right to move in in in the F district implemented by the SH Corporation to apply for the sale of urban development apartment units (the right to move in refers to the right to move in as one of the relocation measures according to the implementation of public projects, such as the Seoul Metropolitan Government urban planning project and housing site development project; and (iv) the right to purchase housing units is called “right

D On September 14, 2002, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for selling G in KRW 30,000,000 (hereinafter “H”) and issued its certificate of personal seal impression at the Plaintiff’s request.

D around May 2003, at the Plaintiff’s request, delivered the certificate of personal seal impression and related documents in blank to the Plaintiff.

On October 7, 2002, Defendant B entered into a contract for the exchange between the Plaintiff and Defendant B to purchase KRW 64,00,000 of the F-gu apartment site in the F-gu that will be supplied from the SH Corporation due to the removal of 201, Seongbuk-gu Seoul (hereinafter “J”) from the Plaintiff on October 7, 2002. However, if the F-gu apartment site in the F-gu is not located in the 33-dimensional apartment site, it entered into a contract for the exchange of the F-gu apartment site in another 33-dimensional apartment site.

Defendant B paid to the Plaintiff the purchase price of KRW 5,00,000,000 on the day of the above contract, and KRW 59,000,000 on October 17, 2002, and paid all the purchase price to the Plaintiff.

However, the actual supply by the SH after the removal by J was the right to move into the apartment complex of 25 square meters in the K district (hereinafter “L”).

Accordingly, the plaintiff and the defendant B are G and the defendant on February 28, 2003.

arrow