1. The Defendant’s revocation of the license granted to the Plaintiff on August 30, 2012 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 22, 2012, at around 16:20 on June 22, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) driven a car in the front side of the “brying soup” phase, which is located in the original city level; (b) provided that “AK department store,” and (c) received a demand from B to continue to teach; (d) requested from B to stop driving approximately 30 KK from the front day of the “brying so that B may not get off the car; and (e) detained B for about 30 minutes by driving approximately 30 KK from the 16:50 m of the same day on the same day; and (e) making it possible for B to get B to get off the car.

(hereinafter “instant confinement”). B.

The defendant on August 30, 2012, against the plaintiff, the plaintiff above A.

The Plaintiff’s revocation of the Plaintiff’s driver’s license (hereinafter “instant disposition”) was made on the ground that the instant act of confinement by using a motor vehicle was indicated in the port.

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on September 20, 2012, but the appeal was dismissed on October 30, 2012.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 1 to 6, and Eul's statements (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) In light of the following: (a) the Plaintiff was deprived of B by intimidation or assaulting B, and thus did not forced the Plaintiff to board the vehicle; (b) the Plaintiff was replaced by B in order to recover the relationship with B, and there are circumstances to consider the circumstances; (c) the Plaintiff was minor; (d) the Plaintiff did not assault or threaten B in the course of carrying B on the vehicle; and (e) the Plaintiff did not want the Plaintiff’s punishment; and (e) the instant disposition was in violation of the law that abused discretion by excessively harshing the Plaintiff.

(b) the attached Form of the relevant statute;