1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

On April 1, 2017, the Plaintiff is a person dismissed on December 4, 2017 when working as a visiting professor at C University D (hereinafter referred to as “D”) by concluding a contract for appointment of visiting professor with the president of C University.

Defendant Republic of Korea has established and operated C University pursuant to Article 11(1) of the Framework Act on Education, Article 3 and Table 1 of the Decree on the Establishment of National Schools.

Defendant B is a person who serves as the dean of D.

On January 31, 2017, the plaintiff was working for E Corporation and retired on January 31, 2017.

On April 1, 2017, the Plaintiff’s term of appointment of visiting teachers under Article 2 (Period of Contract) ① The term of appointment contract is from April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018.

Article 3 (Assignment and Class of Contracts) (1) The affiliation of the plaintiff shall be C University D public University.

(2) The class of the plaintiff's contract shall be a visiting professor.

Article 5 (Benefits and Retirement Allowance) (1) The plaintiff's annual salary shall be forty-two thousand won.

(4) Where a person works in good faith for at least one year, a retirement allowance shall be paid, and the amount paid shall be paid an amount equivalent to a monthly amount of pay by one year.

Article 7 (Terms and Conditions of Recontract and Procedures) (1) The plaintiff may file an application for re-contract accompanied by materials to prove the business (actual) performed during the contract period at least four months prior to the expiration of the contract period.

(2) After examining the business status submitted by the Plaintiff, the appointing authority shall notify the Plaintiff of whether to renew the contract two months prior to the expiration of the contract term.

(hereinafter omitted) was concluded.

On November 3, 2017, the Plaintiff submitted a resignation letter to C University and did not work in D thereafter.

C. On December 4, 2017, the president of C.C. was dismissed from office against the plaintiff.

[Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the claim for benefits on February 1, 2017 and March 3, 2017, as to the absence of dispute, the entry of Eul’s evidence No. 1, and the grounds for the entire argument. The Plaintiff actually worked in D from February 1, 2017.