Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Damage to property;
A. On April 29, 2015, at around 21:00, the Defendant destroyed two glasss ( approximately 30 cm, approximately 50 cm in length) from the victim’s public telephone, which is located adjacent to “C convenience stores” located adjacent to “C convenience stores” located adjacent to the Busan Seo-gu, Busan, thereby destroying them.
B. The Defendant damaged the pipe tamp (3m in diameter) by breaking up the pipe tamp, which is installed next to the above convenience store managed by the victim D, at the above time, at the above time and place, and the market price is unknown.
2. On April 29, 2015, the Defendant obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) at the aforementioned place on April 29, 2015, at the same time; (b) on the police officer F of the Busan Police Station Escopic Police Station, who was called out after receiving a report to scoping the above scopic scopic, and after receiving a request for accompanying to confirm the damage and damage of property, and (c) the police officer of the Busan Police Station Escopic Police Station affiliated with the Busan Police Station Escopic scopic scopic scopic scopbling, and scoping the scopic scopic scopic scopbling, after arresting a flagrant offender arrested and moving to Escopic scopic scops; and (d) the Defendant interfere with the maintenance of the order of the victim’s left scopic scopic s.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each statement (No. 5 through 8, No. 12) of the court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and estimates on damage;
1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (see Supreme Court Decision 2009Do3505, Jun. 25, 2009)
1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;