logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.04.23 2015고단373
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On March 1, 2008, A, an employee of the Defendant, as the driver of B freight vehicle, violated the Defendant’s vehicle operation restriction by loading and operating freight of 13.39 tons and 12.74 tons at the third axis of the said vehicle in excess of 10 tons of the restricted axis at the educational 404, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Gyeongsan Port Port Port Port Authority located in the Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, and in addition, around 19:2 of March 1, 2008.

2. The part of Article 86 and Article 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008) that "if an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83(1)2 with respect to the business of the corporation, a fine of KRW 300,00 has been determined by the summary order subject to review, but Article 86 of the above Act provides that "if the agent, employee or other worker of the corporation commits an offense under Article 83(1)2 with respect to the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article) shall be retroactively invalidated

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow