Defendant

A A Fines of 500,000 won, Defendant B of a fine of 500,000 won, Defendant C of a fine of 500,000 won, and Defendant D of a fine of 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

D is a person who is serving in the Daegu District Court in relation to the validity of the election and has been elected as a candidate for the president of the tenant representative of the Daegu Suwon-gu F apartment, and the defendant B, A, and C are members of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee of the above apartment.

The Defendants recruited to interfere with the business by occupying the above apartment management office on the ground that the victim G, the head of the management office, did not inform Defendant D of the business transfer.

On August 25, 2013, the Defendants found the above apartment management office around 19:00 and interfered with the victim’s management office by force, including hiding the key and the key of the victim’s book-keeping and the glnet key, while leaving the office of management office of the H, the head of the guard, and the guard workers J. “from the Lao to the management office of the emergency countermeasures committee, the emergency countermeasures committee leaves the office of management office of management, and arbitrarily replacing the entrance of the management office of the above apartment, from the time to August 30, 2013.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. The legal statement of the witness K at the court (for the defendant C, the protocol of examination of the witness to the witness K);

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. A G statement (the additional statement by the complainants - the replacement of heats);

1. Each explanatory note of J, L, H, I, M, and K;

1. Application of inducements, and Acts and subordinate statutes governing work areas;

1. Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (Amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014)

1. The Defendants and the defense counsel’s act of determining the assertion of the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is recorded in the facts charged.