logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.07.26 2015노3608
모욕
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Although the summary of the grounds for appeal stated the victim’s statement as stated in the facts charged, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case by misunderstanding the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment although the defendant’s statement other than the defendant and the victim was not recognized

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined in the judgment of the court below and the court of the trial, performance is recognized since it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant, at the time of making the victim’s statement as to the facts constituting the crime as stated in the judgment of the court below, members of the workplace, including F, took the Defendant’s speech in the vicinity.

A) At the time of the Defendant’s consistently speaking from an investigative agency to the court of the court below, the victim and witness F had three or more persons around F and H et al.

statement is made.

B) In principle, the Defendant and the victim’s factories have the respective inspection section, and the automobile subject to the inspection passes by Rabs, the inspector’s scope is equivalent to 5.5m wide. However, in fact, even if the inspector did not inspect only within the inspection section, and even if the inspection section of another inspector is not limited to the one’s inspection section, the Defendant and the victim are conducting the inspection in the form of examining the respective parts of the inspection.

C) The Defendant and the victim were under dispute since the date of the instant case, and the team members working at the nearest distance continued to see the Defendant and the victim, and the Defendant and the victim continued to use ney.

D) At the time of the Defendant’s speaking to the victim, the Defendant and the victim were inspecting one vehicle, and F and H were inspecting the next vehicle and reporting the dispute between the Defendant and the victim. The Defendant is a large sound.

arrow