1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The court of first instance dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B, C, and D at the court of first instance, while dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants, and accepted the conjunctive claim, and only the Defendants appealed. Thus, the claim against Defendant B, C, and D at the court of first instance becomes final and conclusive separately, and only the conjunctive claim against the Defendants falls under the scope of the party members’ judgment in accordance with the principle of prohibition of disadvantageous alteration.

2. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court is the same as that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

3. Judgment on the plaintiff's conjunctive claim

A. Determination 1 as to the cause of claim 1) Since L, which is the plaintiff's plaintiff's assertion, purchased the land of this case from I on May 31, 1950 and donated it to the plaintiff. Since the plaintiff succeeded to the above possession for a total of 20 years, the period of prescription for the plaintiff's possession of the above land has expired. Therefore, the defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for the registration of transfer of ownership due to the completion of the prescription for the acquisition of possession as to the land of this case. (2) The defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for the registration of transfer of ownership due to the completion of the prescription for the acquisition of possession as to the land of this case. (3) The plaintiff's above facts and circumstances can be acknowledged in full view of the following facts and circumstances, which can be recognized as the whole purport of the arguments in Gap's testimony and testimony of the witness M.