Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants were known to the general public, and on June 2013, Defendant A purchased a vehicle under his name upon request from Defendant B and had Defendant B operate the vehicle. Defendant B operated the said vehicle on behalf of Defendant A while operating the said vehicle.

Accordingly, on June 20, 2013, Defendant A entered into a contract for the purchase of a vehicle with the motor vehicle with DK9, which was introduced by Defendant B at Suwon-si, with the loan of KRW 62,50,000 from the victim Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd., and on the 24th of the same month, Defendant A registered the establishment of a mortgage on the said vehicle with the mortgagee's company and the bond value of KRW 62,50,000,000, and delivered the said vehicle to Defendant B.

Defendant

B In the status of paying approximately KRW 5,60,000,00 of the loans to be extended to Defendant A during the operation of the said car by delivery, the same is required to provide Defendant A with a telephone around December 2013 and lend money to the lender as security by putting on the phone.

In order to provide security, the documents need to be sent as a certified copy, a certificate of seal impression, a copy of identification card, etc.

In different words, Defendant A agreed to provide the said car as security by sending a certified copy of resident registration, a certificate of personal seal, and a copy of identification card to Defendant B.

Defendant

B around December 2, 2013, at the office of a mutual infinite loan company located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, a loan of KRW 8 million from a nameless loaner, and as above, documents such as a certificate of personal seal impression, resident registration certificate, and identification card copy received from Defendant A were drawn up and provided as security.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the exercise of rights by the victim company.

(i) the evidence;