The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On June 24, 2014, the Defendant prepared a false complaint against D at the attorney-at-law B law office located in Class C, and at the attorney-at-law office located in Class C, written a false complaint against D.

Around October 2010, the complaint states that "the defendant requested that A, the complainant, be able to resume the E which has already been closed down, and that A, the complainant, continues to engage in the business, which is likely to be punished as fraud, made a voluntary report of business closure, so I would no longer participate in the business.

However, the Defendant Claimant, after deceiving A, who was the complainant, had the seal impression affixed to the above seal impression in the minutes of the provisional shareholders' meeting, had the complainant affixed the above seal impression on the false copy of the provisional shareholders' meeting and had it notarized. As stated in the case of change of executive officers of the above minutes of the provisional shareholders' meeting, as stated in the case of change of paragraph (2) of the above provisional shareholders' meeting, the complainant clearly stated that A would not agree to appoint him as an auditor and would no longer participate in it, and there was no consent to appoint F as a director at all, the Defendant did not appoint him as a representative director by an secret vote, and there was no difference in the fact that the provisional shareholders' meeting was held, a notary public was not aware of the fact that the minutes of the provisional shareholders' meeting was notarized by the law firm at all, and most of all, the Defendant Appellant was aware of the fact that a notary public had not been notarized by the law firm, and thus, he could have been punished as a fraud,

Therefore, without notifying the complainant of any fact with respect to the above minutes of the temporary general meeting of shareholders, the defendant shall forge the private document by deceiving the complainant, obtaining the seal impression from the complainant, and affixing it without permission on the minutes of the above temporary general meeting of shareholders against the complainant's will, and a notary public shall present the above investigation document to the law firm.