All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal has continued to be managed by Defendant B, and the general meeting decided to pay benefits to the management office employees including Defendant B in return for the above management.

The Defendants, from April 2008 to December 201, 201, sent the notice of management expenses from April 2008 to December 2, 201 to the above general meeting, was well aware that there was no possibility of receiving management expenses even if they sent the notice.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is erroneous because there is no deception or deception.

2. The lower court, based on the evidence duly adopted and examined, received unemployment benefits upon Defendant A’s application for unemployment benefits with the approval of the head of the E commercial building management office around May 30, 2008 after taking measures for cutting-down of the E commercial building around April 28, 2008. From July 4, 2008 to September 17, 201, the head of the Seo-gu F apartment management office in Gwangju, the manager of the GF apartment management office in the G corporation from February 8, 201 to December 20, 201, the owner of the building, including the owner of the building, worked as the manager of the E commercial building in the Gwangju Mine-gu Corporation in the management office, and the owner of the building, including the owner of the building, could not be seen as the maintenance fee of the E commercial building in the normal level of the E commercial building.