logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.07.24 2018고단2022
개발제한구역의지정및관리에관한특별조치법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From May 2003, the Defendant occupies B stock farm site and its ground buildings in South-do, Namyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, which is a development restriction zone.

1. The Defendant changed the use of a building without permission from the competent authority on January 17, 2004, using three Dong buildings (217.8m2, 297m2, 247.5m2, 247m2) of light-weight steel-frame building, which had been continuously permitted as animal and plant facilities from around January 17, 2004, as the original warehouse and the place of business, as the original warehouse and the place of business.

2. The Defendant constructed an unauthorized building without obtaining permission from the competent authorities, and constructed a 18mpon container adjoining to one building indicated in paragraph (1) to be used as a restaurant on December 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a accusation, investigation report on illegal acts (including field photographs), land register, confirmation certificate of land use plan, general building ledger (influenced buildings), certificate of all registered matters;

1. Article 32 Subparag. 1 and the proviso to Article 12(1) of the Act on Special Measures for the Establishment and Management of Areas subject to Restriction on Development of Relevant Article 32 of the Act on Special Measures for Criminal Facts, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The scale and duration of offenses with reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, the same criminal records and twice the same offense: Provided, That it shall be reflective, and comprehensive consideration of the circumstances of crimes;

arrow