A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 1, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of aiding and abetting fraud in the Jung-gu District Court Goyang Branch on September 1, 201, and six months in the same court on October 26, 2017 and filed an appeal for the same crime, etc., and is currently pending in the appellate court trial. On September 14, 2017, the Defendant was not detained for the same crime in the same court and is currently pending in the trial of the first instance.

The Defendant: (a) took advantage of the fact that there is a need for a passbook to commit so-called “singishing” fraud; (b) transferred the passbook to a nameless person committing the fraud of “singishing” to a third party; and (c) was willing to withdraw the amount of damage caused by the fraud when the amount of damage caused by the fraud is deposited into the passbook and use it at will.

On February 2, 2017, the Defendant promised to receive KRW 100,000 per day for 30 days in return for the Defendant’s phone call to the name in the advertisement, and to receive KRW 100,000 per day for 30 days in return for the Defendant’s phone call to the name in the advertisement.

Accordingly, around February 9, 2017, the Defendant transferred to the name in the Seocho-gu “D convenience store” located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, the mother of the Defendant, the Saemaeul Treasury (R) and the e-mail card using Kwikset service.

Around February 10, 2017, a person in charge of the foregoing passbook and the name card was transferred to the victim S without the intention or ability to sell the “LG sn beam P 550” on the following day: (a) by deceiving the victim S as if he/she were to sell the “LG sn beam P 550” on the same day; (b) by receiving KRW 400,000 from the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of E on the same day; and (c) in fact, without the intention or ability to sell the “S 3” upon gallon, he/she was wired KRW 250,000

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the electronic financial transaction access media, and facilitates the so-called “scaming” fraud of acquiring property by deceiving the victim S or T.