A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 10:00 on September 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a 112 report from the Gangnam-gu Seoul Building front of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Building, stating that “Abreath was damaged by Ortoba,” and sought to confirm the details of the Defendant’s report by E, the Seoul Suwon Police Station D District Team affiliated with the Seoul Suwon Police Station, which had arrived at the point of being drunk.

Then, the Defendant was unable to cause a disturbance, and E had a defect in the notification of penalty imposition as an act of a disturbance of drinking alcohol, and E had a assault to E by sculing a ebbbbage, while taking a bath to E.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reports by E, the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement in the police statement protocol against E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes written in the statement prepared by the F;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., conditions favorable to the following reasons for sentencing)

1. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria / [type] the scope of the recommended punishment / [type] where the degree of violence is minor in the mitigation area [a person who has a special mitigation] of the mitigated area (a person who has a special mitigation of punishment / one month to eight months] of imprisonment;

2. In light of the circumstances indicated in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive for a crime, and circumstances after a crime, the sentence shall be determined within the scope of the recommended sentence, taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant, even though around 2015, was punished for the same crime; (b) there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than a suspended sentence; (c) the Defendant has been led to a confession of a crime; and (d) the confession of a crime; and (e) the degree of assault against police officers is minor; and (e) the Defendant’s age, sex, motive for a crime